A fellow named Daniel DiSilva, the founder of what's called the "Divine Mercy Institute", gave a sensational talk at my church last week, going into extreme depth regarding the origins and history of the original painting, as well as background on where all of the cheap-- to my eyes, frankly-- clones came from.

For those who haven't ever seen the painting, here it is. My church bought a beautifully framed, 1:1 scale, full-size print of this, at 8000 dpi!



This was painted originally by a guy who was taking instructions straight from a sister, who was herself taking instruction straight from Jesus. She had this artist re-do just the right arm something like seventeen times-- every little detail had to be perfect. She had the artist spend immense time on the face in particular, as restorers had later discovered while doing repairs.

Many years ago I wrote about the "Shroud of Turin". I'm struggling to find the post now, but the gist of it is that I spent hours and hours researching it, categorizing all of the various pieces of evidence on all sides of the question. In the end, I concluded that the shroud is actually real-- the only way scientists were able to reproduce the image was by using many millions of dollars of high-tech equipment to bombard a fabric with insane amounts of ultraviolet radiation.

Here is the face in the shroud, corrected for contrast:



It stands to reason then that if the shroud really does show us Jesus's face, and the sister was taking direction straight from Jesus, the two faces should be pretty similar, right? Let's compare:



I zoomed way the heck in within The Gimp, and started drawing some measurement lines, counting pixels:



The gist of it is that the two faces are extremely similar: notice the shape of the eyebrows, the shape and proportions of the nose especially the thin bridge and the bulb, the way the nostrils flare upwards diagonally, the shape and composition of the facial hair, the shape and width of the mouth, and even the relative ratios of all the constituent parts.

The picture in the painting is slightly wider ratio-wise, and the nose is just a smidgen shorter, along with some other minute differences. But overall, it's not a stretch to say that it's the same face. The face on the shroud might simply appear thinner because of gauntness from the ordeal Jesus went through-- whereas perhaps he had the sister and painter convey His physical form from healthier days?