This test is pretty hilarious; their definitions of what constitutes "Fascism" were pulled out of a hat: some sort of fit, but others are indicative of clear bias.

If you want mom to cook dinner and dad to have a job, then you're evidently a Mussolini acolyte. If anything, collectivist ideologies denigrate the traditional family so that the children can be wards of the State. Defining "traditional values" as "Fascist" is simply a way of labeling Christian Conservatives, most of whom are Classical Liberals these days.

Another example is the rebirth "myth", which is merely a poorly disguised shot at "Make America Great Again". If you have a prolific scientist who becomes an unemployed Cheeto-scarfing slob, then decides to start eating healthy again while resuscitating his career, that's a rebirth-- and it's a good thing. Same goes for ten people, or ten million people following that pattern, restoring the national character (tourism, trade, industry, etc.): these examples are not "myths", nor do they have anything to do with Fascism.

Interestingly, I answered the question once as myself, and scored around a 30%. In the spirit of Jonathan Heidt, I answered again as a Social Justice Warrior, and obtained around an 80%. Yet I don't sense that the academics who phrased the questions fully considered just how closely "their side" fits many of these definitions, such as "press and speech control", and "denunciation of enemies".