This is a phenomenal article, and it's morbidly fascinating to see the kinds of covert disruptions which are usually associated with the CIA and employed against other countries, leveraged against my own country. There is a quibble though: right-of-center writers always feel the need to throw a bone-- "it's perfectly proper to feel outraged!"-- when by doing so, they themselves are being the "useful idiots".

The two events with led to Colin Crapperdick and the "Black Lives Matter" domestic terrorist organization were "he was just getting Skittles" Trayvon, and "hands up don't shoot" Michael Brown, both of which wound up being the diametric opposites of the narratives, once all of the facts were known. Now we're on act three: the George Floyd show-- and so far it's just as fallacious as the two chapters which preceded it.

"But look at all of these examples of 'systemic racism'!"

Uh-huh.

The only "systemic racism" I see are the legally institutionalized anti-white and anti-Asian "affirmative action" programs which plague universities, government agencies, and corporations. What's more, when you break down the statistics, whites are more likely than blacks to be killed by police officers in America. And the fact that your ancestor three hundred years ago was sold into slavery by his own brother back in Ghana has zero bearing on the agency you have today.

So no, these rioters and protesters do not have a cause to "feel outraged", if indeed they even do feel that way, and they're not just extensions of the "free shit army" mentality: "which levers can I push to obtain power over others, so I can make what's theirs, mine." I find it suspicious that the first thing which happens in every one of these "mostly peaceful protests" is that people start smashing store windows, and walking out with flat panel televisions.