The Exigent Duality
Davos Cyber Pandemic - 14:30 CST, 10/10/21 (Sniper)
It looks like the next false flag catastrophe is going to be a so-called "cyber pandemic": people have already surrendered their most fundamental freedoms for one "pandemic" ("plandemic", "scamdemic"), so the silly name makes sense, stacking on the precedent building I've been warning about on this blog since early 2020.

If you have a half an hour to spare, listen to this: I did, and took some notes.

  • I think this false flag will use back doors in Windows and other operating systems. This session starts off by warning that the apparently impending "cyber pandemic" will be like the 2003 malware disaster, but much larger in scope. I was working tech support at Best Buy that year, and the reason that worm was so bad was because Windows XP was a piece of junk: 100% of the "infected" systems were Windows XP installations, we had a whole room of them. Windows 10 / 11 are a million times more secure-- hence why this will probably be back door-driven

  • The first "guest" was some dude named David Koh-- a government bureaucrat from Singapore. He emphasized that now that the WuFlu has made "us" all "dependent on digital services", that they all need to be "viewed as essential." And since they are "essential", there is "collective responsibility" to
    "optimize the full potential of the digital economy" and "increase the cyber hygiene of all internet users". I'd never heard that term before: it's a scary one, and again cleverly chosen.

  • He also said that the threat will have a "constantly changing nature", and that as a result there will need to be "close cooperation between all stakeholders". In other words, it will be endlessly convenient moving of goal posts, just like they did with the WuFlu.

  • Next up was some typically thin-lipped Australian female bureaucrat-- the sort who is locking people in camps in Sidney-- named Michelle Price, from some group called "AustCyber". She talked about "Quadtech", a "special network between Australia, the United States, India, and Japan". I don't know if she meant computer network or not, since she then went on the blab about "collaboration" and "think tanks".

  • She emphasized repeatedly that "public / private partnerships are critical"-- so, Fascism. She said that they would need to "ensure trust" and "ensure availability"-- not sure if "trust" means authentication between systems, or "public trust" in whatever the heck they're doing? She also threw out the term "trusted market". She ended by exclaiming, with an obvious "duper's delight" smile that "we're living a cyber pandemic right now!"

  • The next speaker was a Jew in Israel named Gil Shwed, who is the CEO of some company called "Check Point Software Technologies". This guy was just there to get rich selling network equipment, as all he had to say repeatedly was that "we" need to "build infrastructure"-- which of course, his company conveniently makes as he pointed out. He said that with this "cyber pandemic" that "every attack will be a new mutation"-- another WuFlu precedent, moving goal posts. This time, it'll be his company selling the endless "booster shots."

  • Finally, there was by a mile the scariest person present: a DC Swamp creature named Clara Tsao. Her job title was "Global Shaper". Speaking of shapes, her face was shaped like a fleshless human skull, sort of like the "scream mask"-- and she had this bright red lipstick on. Her eyes were solid black. As she spoke, in between every single pause her face would elastically snap into this huge, fake ear-to-ear lip-filled bright red grin, like "Joo Dee" from "Avatar: The Last Airbender".

  • She was immediately teed up by Samir Saran, the host. Almost the first word he threw out was "infodemic"-- yet another new term! "We're seeing all of this fake news, post-truth (?), misinformation, and synthetic data (?)." What does Joo Dee think about all of this?

  • The first thing she says is that it's the "most vulnerable" who are suffering-- those darned old people, clicking on Fox News! She explains that she's a "disinformation researcher" (and I'm the Queen of England), who came "through a White House program". She then postures about her care for small businesses-- I guess like how Davos initiated the world's largest wealth transfer in history to multi-billion dollar corporations during the WuFlu scamdemic?

  • "An example of these problems are all of the 'misinformation' regarding mask wearing." So, she's referring to Dr. Fausti in March of 2020, then? Then she threw out that term again: "cyber hygiene." Clearly, they all got the memo on that one.

  • She then made the most disingenuous series of statements spoken during the entire half hour, that plastic grin glued onto her face the entire time: in the span of two sentences, I listened in amazement as she pivoted from "none of our infrastructure is secure", to "no one is trusting our election systems even though they are totally secure." Her mid-stream 180 degree pivot was scary enough, but for anyone who watched the Maricopa Audit as I did, her statements were patently absurd too.

  • The presentation concluded with what the "new ideal" should be, so that "everyone can work together". Once again, "public / private partnership" will be key-- so, think multi-billion dollar corporations violating the Nuremberg Code with their employees, at the government's behest: governments and corporations caring about our health!

  • The most interesting question came from the host: "Do you think citizens trust enterprises enough?" The Australian woman responded by first saying that the "word 'trust' needs to be 'redefined'", and that the "old version", "from the 1960s", just doesn't work anymore. I need to get out my globalist decoder ring to decipher what she meant by that. But second, she said that they can get citizens onboard by "leveraging psychology", since "people already use and trust technology."

So there you have it-- hopefully these notes will be helpful to people; there is a significant chance that the next manufactured crisis will take this direction.