And on that bombshell, let me segue into a related topic. In 2015, the UN published-- and got member states to sign-- an agreement called "The Sustainable Development Agenda". You can read the entire document, along with supporting facts, straight off of the UN's site.
If you click into the little colored boxes on the right-hand side, you'll see that they propose nation states provide free income and food to poor people, free clean water, free healthcare, free education, make laws to force equality-of-outcomes for women in the workplace and in terms of wages, free jobs, and on and on it goes. Not only that, but every box discusses how "developing countries" are "lagging behind", and that these "global issues" do "not respect national borders." You can see where this is going. But if you still have any doubts, check out the "how much will this bullshit cost" section of their FAQ, bold emphasis is mine:
"In order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), substantial investment will be required, in both developed and developing countries. This agenda will require the mobilization of significant resources-- in the trillions of dollars. But these resources already exist. There are far more than enough savings in the world to finance the new agenda. How to direct investment so that it supports sustainable development will be crucial for achieving our Goals."
See? Your family already has a savings account in the bank, it's just a matter of an unelected UN or EU bureaucrat confiscating it, so they can "direct" how it's "invested"! Don't believe me?
"Resources need to be mobilized from domestic and international sources, as well as from the public and private sectors."
And American white men: you know those billions of dollars you've been forced to pay over the decades in reparations to inner-city minorities, so they can afford booze, $50k Cadillacs, the latest iPhone, and twelve illegitimate children per woman, many of whom go on to become violent criminals? Now you get to pay for the people in Africa too, because the model worked so well here!
"Official development assistance is still necessary to help the countries most in need, including the least developed countries, to achieve sustainable development."
So, how does one opt out of this "New World Order Utopia"? What if one doesn't want to participate? Too bad for you:
"All stakeholders: governments, civil society, the private sector, and others, are expected to contribute to the realisation of the new agenda."
See, Leftists want to enact a global "one world government", if not explicitly-- like via Hitlery Clinton's actual calls for a "Western Hemisphere government"-- then de facto, by having supra-national "organizations" like the UN or the EU override the voting public within nation states. This new world order will take the form of a Communist-Green Soviet "ten year plan"-style utopia, which will forcefully extract resources from the Cultural Marxist-defined "oppressors"-- white men, primarily-- and redistribute those plundered goods to the "oppressed", like women and black people.
When the Bolsheviks came to town, they took anyone who disagreed with them out to the garden behind the house, and shot them on their knees in the back of the head, execution-style. Ditto for Che Guevara in Cuba when Castro took over. Same with Kim il Sung in Korea. Same with Mao, in China. If you don't think this new "plan", with its "expectations" that everyone "participate" in the "mobilization" of "private sector savings" to achieve "social justice goals" will result in the same kind of door-to-door violence, then I just don't know what to tell you. After all, do sexist, racist, Fascist bigots who stand between you and utopia deserve anything other than that sort of fate?
Or, why don't I just let the hideously obese violent multiple-times divorced Jeremy Clarkson put it straight for us? According to him, pro-Brexit voters are just "coffin-dodging idiots who don't want to live next to Syrians." See how that works? They're just racist old bigots who have outlived their usefulness-- why not just confiscate their property "for the greater good"? I guess he'd say the same thing about the hundreds of millions of people who support Viktor Orban in Hungary, who voted for Trump, or who support the Five Star Movement in Italy, just to name a few examples? Yes Jeremy: you and Occasional Cortex and Nancy Pelosi and Jeremy Corbyn are just so wise, and so much smarter than the rest of us.
How anyone with any grasp of history, basic human psychology, or "day one lecture" economics principles-- hell, even the ability to apply basic, independent reasoning skills-- could not see where this is all headed, and how important it is to support movements like Brexit, is totally beyond my comprehension. The reality is though, virtue-signaling wins the day.