I love all of the commie rhetoric in the AMD Ryzen reviews, such as this one: "Well, Intel's processors were overpriced because Intel had no competition", blah de blah.

Claiming that something was "overpriced" implies that the claimant knows what the proper price "should" be. But how could they possibly know that, absent the market?

Intel was and is moving shit loads of Kaby Lake processors, because the marginal utility of the processors is higher than the marginal utility of the money foregone to obtain one, according to the subjective value preferences of its many buyers. By definition, these processors are not "overpriced", and never have been.