- Better impulse control and a lesser liklihood to engage in criminal behavior (Source)
- Perceive events through a more nuanced and sophisticated moralistic perspective (Source)
- Tend towards firm definitions of right and wrong, versus subjective "moral relativism" (Source)
- Are more conscientous, organized, thrifty, and stable (Source)
- Tend to view and act on situations rationally, versus lefties who do so with emotion (Source)
The question then becomes, who would you rather have in charge during a critical situation: someone who is steady, consistent, rational, can view events from many angles, and knows right from wrong? Or someone who is impulsive, disorganized, unstable, determines "right and wrong" to be whatever is convenient in the moment, and acts via emotional compulsion?
I should add an important disclaimer: it is absolutely crucial that the world have emotional people who view the "care / harm" moral foundation in exclusion from all others. But as thankful as I am every day that such people exist, I want people who are clear and level-headed holding the inevitable leadership roles.