I made the mistake of watching a half hour of the "debate" last night, in the off chance that Donald Drumpf was somehow not an insider, and that the "moderator" would somehow keep his mouth shut, despite having bizarrely written all of the questions himself (that's not how a debate works, people).

Instead, I got this:

• Drumpf: "Stop and frisk" helped get the guns out of the hands of criminals in New York City.


• "Moderator": You do realize that "stop and frisk" was ruled unconstitutional!!



• Hitlery: Police officers are biased against blacks. "Social justice" ftw baby! BLM rules, cops drool!


• "Moderator": (teddy bear voice, gently tossing a softball pitch to Barry Bonds) Do you think police officers are sometimes biased??

And then there was Teflon Don himself...


Context: Hitlery and her sometimes-husband Slick Willy have a history of calling hits against political enemies, going back decades-- bodies would appear, in "mysterious circumstances"; Hitlery let American citizens die at Benghazi, then lied and said the attack was due to an "internet video" to cover her own (significant) ass; Hitlery ran a private email server and let State plans fall into the hands of terrorists-- then lied to the FBI, then tampered with the evidence by wiping the server (for which, hilariously, her tech guy asked for technical help on reddit).

This woman is, quite literally, as sleazy as they come. During her various televised crazy eye-rolling seizure episodes, or when she literally collapsed (likely from pulmonary pneumonia resulting from Parkinson's Disease), I kept waiting for her head to explode, and a bunch of centipedes to run out.

Any competent debater-- even in this monkeyed up, deep state crafted-and-controlled, "the fix is in" format-- would make sure that not a single person watching would even dream of casting a vote for the re-animated corpse that is Ms. Cankles. It would be about as difficult as putting an exhumed Stalin on trial.


Fast forward to the debate: When Hitlery claims that Trump might have "conflicts of interest" because he wouldn't release his tax returns, what would be a logical response from Trump? Oh, maybe he could mention that she was laundering money from third-world dictators through her "foundation" in exchange for arms? Gee, that sounds kind of like a very real "conflict of interest" that has already happened!

Or what about when she was going on about "gun control", and not having guns in the hands of dangerous people? A quick response may have been: "Oh, you mean like all of those guns you sold to ISIS?"

Instead, he defensively wobbles his way through some silly response about waiting for an "audit to be finished" on his tax returns, or agreeing with her about gun control ("I need to keep you happy!"). And when he wasn't redundantly rambling on and on about China, these exchanges pretty much summed up the entire formula of what I saw-- question after question.


How to read this: Donald Drumpf and Hitlery (and Slick Willy!) have all been friends going way, way back; the former is at all of the latter's big birthday bashes, anniversary parties, the former was a Democrat all of his life until just recently, and so on. Maybe he didn't have it in him to tell the truth about his buddy (nice choice of friends!). Or, maybe he's just been a deep state plant all along? Like those old Kix commercials: "Clinton Tested. Soros Approved."

Either way, America's descent into a third-world shit hole will certainly continue unabated, no matter which of these bozos gets into the White House.